In a previous article, the author discussed current trends in utilization rates of chiropractic \u201cName Techniques\u201d in Canada, and provided recommendations for their inclusion into the curriculum at the Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College. In this article, a review of the literature on \u201cName Techniques\u201d was conducted, with interpretation and synthesis by the author. One hundred and eleven articles were found. These were: technique discussions (N = 39), case studies (N = 25), case series (N = 5), experimental studies (N = 25) and clinical trials (N = 17). The literature suggested that prone leg length testing and some x-ray mensurations may have acceptable inter and intra-rater reliability. In addition, there are several case studies that reported significant clinical benefits by patients receiving Activator, Alexander, and Upper Cervical treatments. Patients also reported improvements in quality of life while under either Upper Cervical or Network Spinal Analysis care. This information may help develop professional practice guidelines, and it may have implications for chiropractic research and education.<\/p>\n
J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2001 Jun; 45(2): 86\u201399. [PMCID: <\/span>PMC2505043<\/a>]<\/p>\n Author information:\u00a0Brian J. Gleberzon.\u00a0Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, 1900 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M4G 3E6.<\/p>\n
\n